26.4 C
Jammu
Saturday, March 28, 2026
spot_img

Allahabad High Court Directs NTA To Re-Evaluate NEET OMR Sheet After Student Fills Wrong Booklet Code

spot_img

The Allahabad High Court has directed the National Testing Agency (NTA) to reevaluate the Optical Marks Recognition (OMR) answer sheet of a National Eligibility-cum-Entrance Test [NEET (UG)] 2025 candidate who mistakenly entered the wrong question booklet code.

 

The error resulted in her being awarded only 41 marks, instead of an estimated 589 marks, which would have otherwise placed her within the selection threshold.

 

A Division Bench of Justice Arindam Sinha and Justice Yogendra Kumar Srivastava held, “Petitioner has not alleged that she made mistake in answering any or several questions. Her contention is mistaken mention of the booklet code series. Her mistake has caused omission to evaluate her merit. We see the mistake in that context. Furthermore, the candidate is all of 20 years old and had prepared herself, as other candidates did, to take the examination. To err is human and it happens, in spite of there being notices against commission of errors. The Civil Procedure Code, 1908 does provide for correction of, inter alia, clerical errors made by the Court.”

 

Background

The petitioner admitted to inadvertently writing “46” instead of “47” as the booklet code on her OMR sheet. As a result, her answers were evaluated against an incorrect set of questions, drastically reducing her score.

 

Reasoning

The Court acknowledged the purpose behind shuffling question sequences in different booklets to prevent malpractice but emphasized the disproportionate consequence in this case, “The difference between 41 and 589 is vast. We appreciate that the object of the examination is to select the most meritorious. In this case, there has not been assessment of petitioner’s merit because of this error she committed.”

 

The Court added, “Hence, in event there is assessment of her merit and thereby she displaces somebody, who has less merit, that will require consideration.”

 

The Court thus directed the NTA to reassess the petitioner’s OMR sheet against the correct question booklet (code 47) and report the outcome to the Court.

 

Cause Title: Akshita Singh vs. Union of India & 3 Ors.

spot_img
The Strong Signal
The Strong Signalhttps://thestrongsignal.in
I am a dedicated educator and journalist from Village Chachwah, Tehsil Gool, District Ramban, Jammu and Kashmir. My academic path began with a Bachelor of Physical Education (B.P.Ed.) from Nagpur University, followed by a Master of Physical Education (M.P.Ed.) from Jammu University. In 2019, I was selected as a Physical Education Teacher, but my commitment to broader social issues led me to pursue other meaningful roles. I later served as a Contractual Assistant Professor at Commerce College and M.M. College, where I actively contributed to student development and academic growth. Currently, I serve as the Chief Editor and Owner of The STRONG Signal News Channel, a Jammu and Kashmir–based media platform. The channel is committed to highlighting and addressing crucial issues such as unemployment, poverty, human rights violations, fundamental rights violations, and both local and global exclusive matters that affect everyday lives. Rooted in community values and driven by a passion for truth, I aim to use journalism as a powerful tool to advocate for justice, raise awareness, and empower the unheard voices of society.

Related Articles

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Stay Connected

0FansLike
0FollowersFollow
22,900SubscribersSubscribe
- Advertisement -spot_img

Latest Articles